
The purpose of learning and development (L&D) in most organizations is to upskill or reskill employees, focusing on delivery and consumption. However, L&D is now more critical than ever for the survival and growth of an organization and it must refocus on improving business performance.
With the awakening of many business leaders to the transformational power inherent in learning and development, L&D leaders must reevaluate their approach, focusing not just on upskilling and reskilling employees but also on transformational practices that drive business performance.
COVID-19 amplified this need and awareness. In March of 2020, many organizations had to shift their products, product development and collaborative models, as well as learning programs to accommodate the pandemic. This revealed the stark contrast that exists between the skills that employees possess today and what they need for future successful business performances. The ability to learn is quickly becoming the most important skill for employee and organizational health.
Building capabilities among employees and bridging skill gaps are both vital factors for developing anti-fragile organizations. Organizations that cannot learn, iterate, evolve, and grow will fail. The pandemic proved that – many organizations that were unable, or unwilling, to change failed. Those that weather the storms are resilient. Those that come out of storms stronger are, what Nassim Taleb calls, “anti-fragile.” Anti-fragile organizations are most successful in the long run because unforeseen and stressful events propel them to improved iterations.
A company’s capacity to learn determines its capacity to adapt and innovate. Innovation is crucial for long-term survival. Jim Mattis, former United States Secretary of Defense, writes about the “three Cs” in his book, “Call Sign Chaos.” The Three Cs are unbendable rules needed for successful business performance in any organization, and the first C is “Competency.”
Organizations must continue to focus on competency, organizationally and individually, to thrive in today’s business environment. Corporate L&D teams are central to the success of competency development, understanding that it’s not an event, but a perpetual process of learning, testing, iterating, applying, evaluating, and then starting all over again.
The challenge now is the disconnect between L&D teams and organizational objectives.
L&D leaders are focused on typical (what Kirkpatrick’s model would call either level one or two) metrics - attendance, reaction, and knowledge comprehension. Unfortunately, this is often the case because L&D leaders are not included in initial enterprise strategic and tactical planning. Goals, timelines, and even budgets are set with no representation from L&D. Instead, L&D teams tend to focus on what has historically been easy to measure: attendance, completions, and satisfaction scores. This needs to change so that what they’re focused on is the enterprise progress on goals, as measured by business metrics and KPIs.
As an industry, and as L&D leaders and professionals, it’s time to redefine the purpose of professional learning and development.
The following is a list of things that must be done:
While the task of upskilling and reskilling employees continues to be important, it’s now crucial for the survival and growth of organizations to leverage corporate learning and development as the tip of the spear in product innovations and market penetration and creation.
L&D needs to refocus on not just traditional delivery and consumption, but instead target business performance improvement by aligning enterprise learning tactics to support corporate goals and strategies and leveraging business KPIs.